New Mexico Anti-nicotine services disrupted as funding dries up

This Issue underscores shortcomings in how NM pays for its efforts.

BY DAN MCKAY JOURNAL CAPITOL BUREAU SANTA FE — Quitting is never easy.

But New Mexicans planning to give up tobacco or nicotine may have more trouble finding help this summer.

The state’s contract for the 1-800-QUIT-NOW line ended June 30, and it wasn’t accepting new clients this month.

Earlier this year the state Department of Health abruptly canceled about $741,000 in funding to groups that help people quit smoking — or never start — after revenue from a settlement fund failed to reach expectations.

The disruption in funding underscores long standing shortcomings in how New Mexico pays for much of its anti-nicotine efforts.

Legal settlements with tobacco companies provide funding. But the state has failed to grow an endowment like permanent fund as planned, leaving New Mexico with a less-stable funding stream for nicotine prevention.

This year’s cuts are drawing renewed attention from legislators who say the explosion in vaping among young people makes it all the more important to spend on prevention.

“It’s absolutely critical these programs have continuity,” state Rep. Joanne Ferrary, D-Las Cruces, said in an interview.

State health officials say they are doing the best they can amid a shortfall in New Mexico’s tobacco settlement funds.

Jodi McGinnis Porter, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health, said the state made it a priority to maintain the most essential services for nicotine addiction treatment when the funding came in below projections.

But she acknowledged the state’s Nicotine Use Prevention and Control Program suspended some services — largely marketing and education, she said — to handle the $741,000 reduction in funding.

The department “is looking for other funding sources to support NUPAC in the future,” McGinnis Porter said. ‘Disheartening’

Alex Ross-Reed, executive director of the Health Equity Alliance for LGBTQ+ New Mexicans, or HEAL Plus NM, described the budget cut as “shocking.”

After 20 years of state funding, her organization received an email May 3 directing her to stop work on anti-tobacco services.

“It’s brutal for our organization,” Ross-Reed said in an interview.

Nicotine prevention funding had made up 60% of the organization’s operating budget, she said, helping to fund a directory of behavioral health care providers who are LGBTQ-friendly and other efforts to help people quit tobacco.

The order to stop work, she said, came after HEAL Plus NM had ordered $5,000 in supplies. The organization, she added, wasn’t reimbursed.

Laurel McCloskey, executive director of the Chronic Disease Prevention Council, said her group postponed its annual tobacco policy summit after its state funding was halted.

The disruption in revenue makes it more difficult, she said, for anti-tobacco groups to sustain their work.

“It’s just super disheartening,” McCloskey said.

Her organization, she said, had received state funding for eight years before it was pulled this year.

Funding trouble

The tobacco funding shortfall comes as New Mexico enjoys an oil-and gas revenue boom that has pushed government spending to a record high.

But most of New Mexico’s tobacco cessation programs are funded through a distinct source: settlements reached with big tobacco companies.

In 2000, the state created a tobacco settlement permanent fund as part of the legal agreements. It was intended to be an endowment- like fund that could make annual distributions to pay for tobacco cessation, treatment and similar programs in New Mexico.

At first, about half the annual settlement cash from the tobacco companies went into the permanent fund, and the other half was put to use immediately on health and treatment programs — a balance between covering immediate needs and building a sustainable funding source for future services.

But it hasn’t worked as planned. Amid a budget crunch after the Great Recession, the state turned to the tobacco permanent fund to help bolster its financial bottomline.

Since 2008, the annual payments from tobacco companies have often been spent on services rather than growing the permanent fund.

It’s left the state with a more volatile source of revenue for tobacco cessation programs than if the permanent fund had been allowed to grow and generate predictable income.

Lawmakers pushed to address the problems this year with legislation, Senate Bill 178, that would have moved the tobacco permanent fund out of the state’s general fund reserves.

It would have allowed the $310 million or so now in the permanent fund to be invested more effectively, supporters say, and helped protect it from being used to cover shortfalls in other operations.

The bill won bipartisan approval in both chambers of the Legislature.

But Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham vetoed the legislation without explanation. She didn’t sign it before a constitutional deadline, blocking it from becoming law, a procedure known as a pocket veto.

Rejection of the bill prevented the transfer of about $58 million into the tobacco settlement fund. Budget legislation delivering the injection of funding was contingent on the approval of Senate Bill 178.

A member of the Lujan Grisham administration said the governor didn’t act on the bill, in part, because she wanted more time to evaluate it. The effective date of the legislation was set for July 1 next year, so there’s still time to adopt the bill next year and have it go into effect on the original schedule, the administration official said.

Sen. Martin Hickey, an Albuquerque Democrat who sponsored the bill, said he intends to reintroduce the measure and seek Lujan Grisham’s support.

As a physician, Hickey said, he understands firsthand the value of programs that help people avoid addiction in the first place. Early nicotine use, for example, can prime the brain’s pathways for addiction, he said, underscoring the importance of prevention efforts.

“How often do you have an opportunity to nip that (health issue) in the bud?” he said in an interview.

As it stands now, the American Lung Association gave New Mexico an “F” for funding of tobacco prevention and cessation services. Funding was about 30% of the CDC-recommended level, the association said in a 2023 report.

Preventable death

Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking is a risk factor for cancer, heart disease, stroke and other problems.

The federal government also describes vaping as unsafe for teens and young adults. Nicotine is addictive and can harm brain development, according to the CDC.

The use of electronic cigarettes, however, is on the rise among students. About 34% of high school students in New Mexico reported using e-cigarettes in 2019, a 10 point increase over a five-year period, according to state data.

Outlook

Lawmakers are preparing to question New Mexico’s top health and finance officials about the funding cut.

Rep. Ferrary, chairwoman of the Legislature’s Tobacco Settlement Revenue Oversight Committee, said the panel has scheduled a public hearing in September to ask about the issue.

For Ross-Reed at Heal Plus NM, the budget cut exacerbates what she already sees as a lopsided fight: The cash available to organizations like hers, she said, is tiny compared to the resources available to tobacco companies offering an addictive product.

“I feel like these budget cuts and these decisions,” Ross-Reed said, “have just cut the legs out of what was already hard to do.”

Regulation Happens… To Synthetic Nicotine

Newer Five Pawns synthetic nicotine flavors

I have never tried synthetic nic. I never wanted to, but for those who do, there is trouble ahead. Even Five Pawns switched to synthetic nic. Here is breakdown from the National Law Review by Azim Chowdhury.

“FDA Receives Authorization to Regulate Synthetic Nicotine
Wednesday, March 16, 2022
On March 15, President Joe Biden signed a $1.5 trillion omnibus spending bill to fund the federal government through September. The bill, as passed, includes a provision amending the definition of “tobacco product” in Section 201(rr) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) as “any product made or derived from tobacco, or containing nicotine from any source, that is intended for human consumption.” 21 U.S.C. 321(rr). Now that it is law, this provision closes the synthetic nicotine “loophole” and puts synthetic nicotine products under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) tobacco regulatory authority.

The law will become effective 30 days after the bill’s enactment, i.e., on April 14, 2022 (“Effective Date”). Any synthetic nicotine product currently on the U.S. market as of April 14, 2022, can remain on the market for an additional 30 days until May 14, 2022 (the “Synthetic Nicotine PMTA Submission Deadline”). Manufacturers of synthetic nicotine products wishing to take advantage of FDA’s compliance policy and enforcement discretion after that date must submit a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) to FDA by the enforcement date. If a PMTA is submitted in a timely manner, the product(s) may remain on the market for an additional 90 days after the effective date, i.e., until July 13, 2022. After July 13, 2022, any synthetic nicotine product not authorized by FDA must come off the market.

EVENT DATE NOTES
Bill Enactment March 15, 2022
Effective Date April 14, 2022
Deadline for any new* synthetic nicotine products to enter the market

Deadline for modified synthetic nicotine products to remain on the market

Synthetic Nicotine PMTA Submission Deadline May 14, 2022 (Saturday)
Deadline for submitting PMTAs for all synthetic nicotine products on the U.S. market as of the Effective Date
Final date July 13, 2022 (Wednesday) Deadline for unauthorized synthetic nicotine products to remain on the U.S. market
Notably, under the provision, a synthetic version of an existing nicotine product that went through the PMTA process and is now subject to a Refuse-to-Accept (RTA), Refuse-to-File (RTF), Marketing Denial Order (MDO), or withdrawal of a marketing order may not be marketed beyond the effective date, i.e., April 14, 2022. In other words, products originally formulated with tobacco-derived nicotine that were refused or denied authorization by FDA, then modified to use synthetic nicotine instead (and that is the only modification), will effectively be banned on April 13, 2022. Manufacturers of these products will not be given an opportunity to submit a new PMTA. This appears to be Congress’s way of doubling down on products that, in Congress’ view, switched to synthetic nicotine to get around the PMTA process.

Beyond the PMTA submission requirement, manufacturers of synthetic nicotine products will be subject to all requirements of regulations for tobacco products. This likely includes all other Tobacco Control Act requirements, including tobacco product establishment registration and product listing; ingredient listing; label compliance; and health document submissions, among others. We anticipate that FDA will provide guidance on deadlines for these requirements in the near future.”

https://www.natlawreview.com/article/fda-receives-authorization-to-regulate-synthetic-nicotine

Stop The Excessive Tax!

A crippling new federal tax on safer nicotine products and low-risk alternatives to smoking is being proposed as part of the funding bill for President Biden’s “Build Back Better” plan. This tax would severely limit Americans’ access to safer alternatives and would only punish people who are trying to quit smoking by making all nicotine and smoke-free tobacco products unaffordable. 

Below is a table showing the devastating effects of this proposed tax on nicotine (TFN, synthetic, and tobacco-derrived), and how it would affect bottled e-liquids. These figures are just the extra taxes you’ll be paying and don’t include the cost of the e-liquid.

Take Action Now : https://casaa.org/call-to-action/stop-an-excessive-federal-tax-on-safer-nicotine-products/

From the CEO…

casaa-color-logo-high-res.jpg

“As expected, reports of people being hospitalized due to a “mystery lung disease” continue to grow. The non-communicable lung disease that is increasingly being linked to products such as K2/Spice and/or adulterated THC cartridges–sold by underground sellers–is now under investigation in 22 states including CA, CT, FL, IL, IN, IA, MN, MI, NC, NJ, NM, NY, PA, TX, UT, WI, and as of Thursday, Colorado has its first confirmed case.

As of Friday morning, one death in Illinois is being attributed to an unknown substance that people are consuming by way of vaping. CASAA extends our condolences to the family and share in everyone’s disappointment in knowing that this tragic death could have been prevented if more compassionate policies were in place.

In last week’s Heads Up Round Up we briefly highlighted the concern that state and federal drug policy is complicating diagnosis, patient care, and accurate reporting about these clusters of lung disease. But in the wake of these reported illnesses, almost all of the usual anti-tobacco campaigners are using this event to elevate their cries for an all-out ban on nicotine vaping products–especially e-liquids sold in flavors other than tobacco.

Anti-tobacco campaigners are advocating for policies that will do absolutely nothing to prevent events like this in the future. Rather, it is more likely that heavy regulation–even if it isn’t total prohibition–will lead to more instances of people being harmed by fake pot, adulterated THC, or poorly manufactured nicotine products sold on an unregulated, illicit market. According to an article on TechCrunch, the FDA is still uncertain if the products being used even fall under the agency’s regulatory authority.

CASAA is reaffirming our advice to consumers that vapor products (THC and nicotine) should be purchased from reputable sources and not “on the street.” We also note that the terminology used to discuss this issue can benefit from including a clear distinction between nicotine vaping, THC/cannabis vaping, and synthetic cannabinoid vaping (k2/spice). Simply reporting that a mysterious lung disease is generally attributable to “vaping” will have harmful unintended consequences such as sending people back to combustible tobacco or discouraging them from making the switch at all.”

Stay safer,

Alex Clark, CEO
CASAA